Dan Patrick’s Fox News Comments On Coronavirus Embarrassing

What about younger sick people, Dan Patrick? Fox comments on coronavirus were morbid. If you want a recipe for embarrassing Texas, here’s a foolproof one: A minute of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, a dash of Fox News, and a dollop of social media. Patrick, the second-term Republican, managed to shoot to the top of news feeds late Monday by suggesting – even if not as directly as his critics said – that senior citizens needed to accept a higher risk of death to prevent an economic depression. “I’m not living in fear of COVID-19. What I’m living in fear of is what’s happening to this country,” Patrick told Fox host Tucker Carlson. “No one reached out to me and said, ‘Are you willing to take a chance on your survival in exchange for keeping the America that all America loves for your children or your grandchildren. Subscribe for unlimited digital access to the news that matters to your community.

Yes, the highest risk of death from COVID-19 is among the elderly.

ICYMI – I was on @FoxNews with @TuckerCarlson tonight. “We’re having an economic collapse,” he said. Patrick, as he is all too capable of doing, undermined his own argument by blowing off important facts. Yes, the highest risk of death from COVID-19 is among the elderly. But what about younger people with underlying conditions – say, a 50-year-old with rheumatoid arthritis, or a 35-year-old diabetic? Should they, too, be prepared to sacrifice to save a few points of GDP? Second, Patrick managed to corrupt a discussion we actually need to have. There are real health trade-offs to a sustained economic disaster and double-digit unemployment. Suicides may rise. Child abuse could spike. And a generation already bludgeoned by student debt and a decade or more of slow economic growth could lose any chance to own a home. They might put off marriage and child-rearing even more, which is a long-term demographic time bomb for the U.S. Hey, who writes these editorials?

Editorials are the positions of the Editorial Board, which serves as the Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s institutional voice. The members of the board are: Cynthia M. Allen, columnist; Steve Coffman, executive editor; Bud Kennedy, columnist; Juan Antonio Ramos, editorial director of La Estrella, the Star-Telegram’s bilingual publication; and Ryan J. Rusak, opinion editor. Most editorials are written by Rusak and edited by Coffman. Editorials are unsigned because they represent the board’s consensus positions, not the views of individual writers. Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right. How are topics and positions chosen? The Editorial Board meets regularly to discuss issues in the news and what points should be made in editorials. We strive to build a consensus to produce the strongest editorials possible, but when we differ, we put matters to a vote. The board aims to be consistent with stances it has taken in the past but usually engages in a fresh discussion based on new developments and different perspectives.

Притворись моей женой ТРЕЙЛЕР (на русском) смотреть онлайн

We focus on local and state news, though we will also weigh in on national issues with an eye toward their impact on Texas or the Dallas-Fort Worth area. How are these different from news articles or signed columns? News reporters strive to keep their opinions out of what they write. They have no input on the Editorial Board’s stances. The board consults their reporting and expertise but does its own research for editorials. Signed columns by writers such as Allen, Kennedy and Rusak contain the writer’s personal opinions. How can I respond to an editorial, suggest a topic or ask a question? We invite readers to write letters to be considered for publication. Patrick, a pro-life warrior, has also apparently missed what should be a remarkable moment for the cause. The country has largely rallied around the idea that protecting life, especially that of the fragile, is worth the sacrifice. You’d think he’d reinforce that message. Patrick pointed out some facts that have been muted: The mortality rate of the virus is low, and while Americans are willing to wait for the worst to pass, they need to know the endpoint.