Can One Recognize Bad Logic And Unsupported Claims?

Re: “Cruz bucks Trump, won’t back White House nominee – He tells Politico that he’s unhappy with Mulvaney friend’s record,” Saturday Metro & Business story. I’ve read that Sen. Ted Cruz opposes Judge Sul Ozerden’s nomination towards the U. S. Court of Appeals for that Fifth Circuit. The goal of this letter would be to request the fact that senator reconsider his opposition. At the moment, Ozerden is really a U. S. District Judge with the Southern District of Mississippi, which really is a trial judge position. I’m a retired U.S. District Judge. Since we sit in exactly the same Circuit, I’ve connected with Ozerden with the 12 years he has been in the bench. He was created and was raised in Mississippi, the son of immigrants. He visited Georgetown University on the Naval ROTC scholarship and graduated with high honors. During his six years as the Navy fighter pilot, operating from aircraft carriers, he flew combat missions over Iraq and Somalia.

Five Most typical Issues With Dan Patrick Reddit

I consider him to be always a true American hero. After his honorable discharge, he attended Stanford Law School, where he again distinguished himself in the classroom. After graduation, Ozerden returned to Mississippi to apply law. From news reports, I am aware that Cruz opposes him predicated on one decision, that your senator considers ill-advised. However, the judge has decided hundreds and a huge selection of cases and, for me, has a right to be evaluated on his system of work, not only one or perhaps a couple of decisions. I also believe Cruz would reap the benefits of a face-to-face ending up in the judge in order that they could discuss the judge’s overall judicial philosophy and any particular cases which are of a problem. In my own view, if that is done, you will see only 1 conclusion – that Sul Ozerden is really a decent person, a genuine patriot and a fantastic judicial officer. Our nation will well be served by placing this good man for the Fifth Circuit. I’m assured that when Cruz gives him another look, he’ll be as convinced when i am.

Dan Patrick Radio

Re: “GOP heavyweights trading right jabs – Patrick accuses Sullivan of ‘destroying’ party after gun checks criticism,” Wednesday news story. Pardon me, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick? You destroyed the Republican Party when i knew it a long time before we heard about Michael Quinn Sullivan! Re: “Raising hope and alarm – Texas A&M researchers have quietly bred sick dogs within their quest for a remedy to human muscular dystrophy/While PETA along with other animal activists protest, families support lab work,” Sunday news story. We applaud both Dallas Morning News and Texas A&M for giving readers an in-depth view on the university’s muscular dystrophy research in dogs. Nobody, especially well-meaning scientists focused on battling disease, is really a big fan of animal research. However, oftentimes, there is no other way. The analysis of living systems, first animals and humans, happens to be essential for medical progress. Anyone who says otherwise isn’t being truthful. We applaud Texas A&M University for maintaining its concentrate on fighting this dreadful disease, despite all of the negativity and propaganda generated by science deniers. Re: “Teacher’s firing upheld – Tweets to president violated district ethical standards, officials say,” Wednesday Metro & Business story.

Those who say freedom of speech was denied for ex-teacher Georgia Clark are wrong. Clark can tweet all of the anti-immigrant tweets to President Donald Trump she wants, no some may be stopping her. But words have consequences. Re: “Does College Lead Students to Cheat? Once the goal is employment rather than education, purpose is lost,” Monday Editorials. This editorial expresses well what I’ve long believed concerning the reason for college education. Needless to say, training for an occupation is essential, but other activities are in least as important. Does one have at the very least a minor grasp of history, literature and art? Is one able to take part in informed conversation about current events? Is one able to learn the worthiness of reading for both pleasure and practical help? Is one able to appreciate factual information while recognizing biased or one-sided views? Is one able to recognize bad logic and unsupported claims? Has one developed sympathy for that less fortunate inside our community and all over the world? Has one learned respect for folks of different races, religions and lifestyles?